|
Replies: 12
| visibility 1
|
Editor [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43515
Joined: 12/12/12
|
TNET: Clemson ranked #2 small sports town in nation
1
Feb 6, 2023, 7:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1665]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1588
Joined: 10/2/00
|
Clemson population = 18,000. Tuscaloosa population >
4
Feb 6, 2023, 7:26 PM
|
|
100,000. Town atmospheres aren't even close to similar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [83135]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 80163
Joined: 11/29/99
|
Fayette, MS 1614 population***
1
Feb 6, 2023, 7:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1487]
TigerPulse: 76%
Posts: 1995
Joined: 1/2/23
|
Alcorn State?
Feb 7, 2023, 1:17 PM
|
|
As in, which one of these doesn't belong?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18323]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7037
Joined: 10/15/21
|
Re: TNET: Clemson ranked #2 small sports town in nation
4
Feb 6, 2023, 7:32 PM
|
|
Shouldn’t of even been ranked what a travesty, living off of past accomplishments bunch of bums. They should’ve put Columbia number one on every list incase you haven’t heard they’re back ?♂️?♂️
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4276]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5460
Joined: 2/20/18
|
Re: TNET: Clemson ranked #2 small sports town in nation
1
1
Feb 6, 2023, 7:41 PM
|
|
The city council will grow us out of that soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8540]
TigerPulse: 48%
Posts: 11521
Joined: 9/9/06
|
Re: TNET: Clemson ranked #2 small sports town in nation
1
Feb 6, 2023, 7:55 PM
|
|
Not much definition here of what the qualifications are as population. Tuscalosa have just over 100,000 population and Clemson about 17,000 so are they in the same category? Chapel Hill is about 76,000 so does this website think that is not a better sports town than Boone?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [657]
TigerPulse: 61%
Posts: 746
Joined: 6/27/21
|
Re: TNET: Clemson ranked #2 small sports town in nation
1
Feb 6, 2023, 8:06 PM
|
|
Greenville is not a small town
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [674]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 393
Joined: 9/26/22
|
Re: TNET: Clemson ranked #2 small sports town in nation
1
Feb 6, 2023, 8:23 PM
|
|
So that means we win!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1943]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 2288
Joined: 1/13/18
|
Re: TNET: Clemson ranked #2 small sports town in nation
Feb 7, 2023, 1:08 PM
|
|
Tuscaloosa is a sh!thole. Who makes these lists?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1943]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 2288
Joined: 1/13/18
|
Re: TNET: Clemson ranked #2 small sports town in nation
Feb 7, 2023, 1:13 PM
|
|
Also, Stanford is actually Paulo Alto and that area is densely populated so another screw up. If you are adding cities like this and Tuscaloosa, south bend is way cooler.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1943]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 2288
Joined: 1/13/18
|
Re: TNET: Clemson ranked #2 small sports town in nation
Feb 7, 2023, 9:05 PM
|
|
My own:
1. Clemson
2. South Bend, Indiana
3. Ann Arbor, Michigan
4. San Marcos, Texas
5. Boulder, Colorado
6. West Point, New York
7. Boone, NC
8. Bloomington, Indiana
9. State College, Pennsylvania
10. Denton, Texas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3240]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1552
Joined: 11/9/11
|
Re: TNET: Clemson ranked #2 small sports town in nation
Feb 7, 2023, 11:16 PM
|
|
#1. South Bend has more than 100k. That’s NOT a small town. It’s an urban city by definition. #2. You’ve clearly never been to Boone. Small town feel. Small town numbers. Insane environment with a family atmosphere. Just like Clemson, they treat visitors like family until kickoff. Clemson is barely a small town by definition. Tuscaloosa is NOT according to the census data. South Bend is an amazing football environment. It’s a close third regardless of size. However, SMALL town is the metric here. Most of the “small towns” on this list do not meet census definition. Including clemson. We are small. We are mighty. But, we’re growing into a metropolis. By census standards. Terrible article and ranking criteria.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 12
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
